<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Long URLs bad for SEO?</title>
	<link>http://www.timskipper.net/internet/are-long-urls-bad-for-seo/</link>
	<description>Cars, motorcycles, driving, business, travel, life... it's all here.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Slideshow Mechanic</title>
		<link>http://www.timskipper.net/internet/are-long-urls-bad-for-seo/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Slideshow Mechanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.timskipper.net/internet/are-long-urls-bad-for-seo/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Hey there,

Good point. I agree with you that Google will need to re-index. This is something I am having to deal with now. In reverse though. 

What is the negative impact of simple URLs on SEO. I noticed in my google webmaster console that it is picking up the same page but the long and the short versions and reporting them back as "problems"

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there,</p>
<p>Good point. I agree with you that Google will need to re-index. This is something I am having to deal with now. In reverse though. </p>
<p>What is the negative impact of simple URLs on SEO. I noticed in my google webmaster console that it is picking up the same page but the long and the short versions and reporting them back as &#8220;problems&#8221;</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
